Karen's Rants and Raves

To content | To menu | To search

Thursday 8 October 2009

20 Years of Nine Inch Nails (Part 2)

closerlittlegirl.jpg From Closer.

Before delving into The Downward Spiral, there is one critically important thing concerning Broken that I forgot to mention last time (shame on me). Since the two bonus songs, Physical and Suck were so different in tone from the rest of the album, the CD version pushed those songs all the way back to tracks 98 and 99, meaning listeners had to skip through 90 blank tracks to get to them. The cassette version of Broken (which was the version I owned until the early '00's) dealt with this problem in a much more elegant way; all you had to do was flip the tape over. This means that NIN managed to produce an album where the cassette version was superior to the compact disc, a nigh-impossible feat.

I told you they were good.

The Downward Spiral

trent_reznor_500x5001.jpg

If you weren't paying much attention to rock in the '90s, a lot of it was like this.

Hole- Courtney Love's band- opened for NIN in the mid-90's, when NIN was touring in support of The Downward Spiral. Love later complained profusely about the debauchery she witnessed on that tour. General rule of thumb: When Courtney Love says that you should be conducting yourself with more decorum and restraint, maybe it's time to re-evaluate your lifestyle.

I can think of no better example of life imitating art than the whole TDS era of NIN. The initial plan for TDS was a kind of thought-experiment on Reznor's part; exaggerate his current problems to the nth degree, and write an album from the perspective of the character he believed he could become in that situation. It was an attempt to deal with the darkest aspects of human nature through art, without having to experience them directly. Fortunately for NIN's value to posterity, but unfortunately for Reznor personally, the narrator's descent into madness and finally self-destruction rang so true for the world at large that most people assumed that the album was (at least mostly) auto-biographical. While the album's themes of substance abuse and megalomania had not been an accurate reflection of his life up to that point, the assumption of millions that he was the person he had written about, added to the excesses of stardom and constant touring, made it hard to tell the difference.

If Reznor acted like a crazy rock star for a good long while (and he admits it), at least he created a record of proportional insanity. I hate it when rock stars think they can get away with the fun stuff and skip the crucial "art" and "suffering" stages. That's just rude.

Closer to Meaning

052.jpg

Okay, you want to know what The Downward Spiral REALLY means? The monkey died for our sins. Clearly.

The phenomenon that grew out of the saturation of the song Closer was unique. Out of context, the song sounds like a frat party anthem; the notoriously dirty chorus tends to grab most of the attention. In the larger context of The Downward Spiral, it's part of an incredibly desperate cry for help that eventually terminates with the narrator committing suicide during the title track. While the chorus can be interpreted as a celebration of nihilism, it's hard to find a "cool" interpretation for lines like "You can have my absence of faith" and "Help me get away from myself!" While most people were blown away by the fact that a commercial single had the word "fuck" in the chorus, the defining phrase of Closer is "Help Me"; it appears four times more often.

Of course, radio stations and MTV were not going to play the song straight out, so the radio edit notoriously contained a pregnant pause where the f-word should be. That edited version, which achieved such ubiquity in the mid-90s that it approached total media saturation, had the effect of making the song sound even more shocking than it actually was. With the word so obviously edited out, it tended to make you scream the word in your head involuntarily. The censorship had the odd effect of appearing to be holding back the brutal nature of the song, which only added to it's allure.

As a kid, I hated Closer; I was too young for TDS at the time, and all I could get out of the song was "Look how dirty this is, isn't this shocking!", and I was a precocious kid who resented that sort of thing. It was only many years later that I came to appreciate it. Lyrically, it's brilliant despite the chorus; the narrator is doing anything he can to stop himself from thinking, a plan where sex is just the latest in a long string of distractions. But he can't decide whether this is a good idea or not. Does abandoning reason and existing on a purely animal level really bring him "Closer to God?" Isn't it supposed to be the other way around? If people are at their most divine when they use their reason, why does running away from it feel like the right thing to do? Earlier in the album, within the song Heresy, Reznor quotes Nietzsche: "God is Dead." Which is really unfortunate, because God tends to be the one you want to answer this sort of thing.

At the end of the day, what is Closer? A celebration of casual sex, or a thinly veiled plea for the grace to believe in God again? Choose your poison.

Closer to Video

199.jpg

Whatever you're doing, you can be sure he disapproves.

For a brief period, the music video for Closer was the only music video admitted to the permanent collection at the Museum of Modern Art. I've heard that they recently added the video for Madonna's Bedtime Stories, also directed by Mark Romanek, which somewhat ruins the effect. Still, it's impressive.

Music videos, as a format, are very strange. Music is music: it doesn't NEED visuals. The institution of the music video has led to a profusion of songs that aren't much on their own, but make for good videos where a bunch of girls in skimpy costumes and body glitter can do some sort of gyrating rain-dance. Musicians without much talent for actual music have been able to ride the video format to fame, and for musicians who are more interested in the songwriting process, the necessity to make videos for every popular song is at best a distraction, and at worst a giant, expensive albatross hung around the neck. The format has also had the effect of screening out of the industry anyone who isn't physically attractive, which is backwards in a medium that should be dependent on how someone sounds, not how they look.

And then there's Romanek's Closer-ballsy, blasphemous, strange, slightly self-parodying, and above all, mesmerizing. In a "sexy" song, one would expect the usual procession of hot chicks parading around the lead singer like he's the best thing since cake; instead we get lizards, bugs, monkey crucifixion, a disembodied beating heart, and a vulnerable incarnation of Trent Reznor who looks like he must have needed to get a permission slip signed in order to appear in the video. While there is "adult content" in the video, as they say, the most adult aspects of it are those that the MTV version didn't have to censor; the little girl who appears throughout (whom we would like to believe is pre-sexual, but isn't), the metronome, the room full of incredulous old men in three-piece suits judging the proceedings, and so on. There's always been plenty of sexuality on display on MTV, but most of the time videos glamorize it; this is, if not the opposite, something different. There's no glamour here, just the inevitability of biology- like lizards laying eggs.

If the song is deceptive in that it sounds like it's about sex but is really about something else at its core, the video is about how most things tend to come back to sex on some level whether we like it or not.

The Bottom of the Spiral

picture-43.png

From Hurt.

I ended up writing far more about Closer than I originally intended, as opposed to the album as a whole. It's such a tempting subject though, and that's symptomatic of the fact that NIN is, on one level, a one-hit wonder. To many fans, NIN is Closer; they have no use for anything else. It dominates the conversation. If I had to pick one other feature of TDS that should warrant special attention (and for the purpose of brevity, let's pretend that I do), it's the fact that the narrator kills himself on the penultimate track, not the final one.

That's right; the narrator kills himself and the album isn't over yet.

Hurt, the final song, is in a different style than the rest of the album. While TDS is sonically a dense, multi-multi layered production, Hurt is mostly just Reznor and a keyboard. In an album that tends to turn traditional song structure upside down violently, the chorus of "What have I become, my sweetest friend" is heartfelt and clean, both lyrically and sonically. I think Hurt was a preview of what some of Reznor's work would sound like a decade later-- Right Where It Belongs could very nearly be passed off as a Peter Paul & Mary song, but I'm getting ahead of myself.

Many people interpret Hurt as a song sung from the point of view of Reznor directly, as opposed to the exaggerated narrator of TDS. By this point, that megalomaniac has blown his head off and isn't around to get in the way. There may be no better end to an album than the way Hurt caps off TDS; after a loud, violent, theatrical self destruction, when the smoke has cleared, Reznor gets to say "Look, this concept album was an interesting experiment and all, but this is really me here. Please listen to me and don't repeat my mistakes." In a way, Hurt is darker than all of TDS: We know that it's only the narrator who died and not the man, but in the crushing sincerity of the album's post-mortem, we can't help but feel that he's not far behind his creation. The sense of loss is overpowering; Despite knowing that Trent Reznor is alive and well, I can't hear this song without a tinge of fear that the singer must already be dead.

Next time, some lighter fare with The Perfect Drug, and the rest of that whole weird period where no one was sure if NIN was going to put out another album or not.

292.jpg

Absinthe: When you're bored with all of the other drugs.

Thursday 17 September 2009

20 Years of Nine Inch Nails (Part 1)

011.jpg

Probably not a typical NIN jam session.

Someone, I can't remember who, casually mentioned to me a couple of months ago that Nine Inch Nails were performing at Jones Beach, and I said "hmm, that's nice." Ideally I would have gone, but I'm a starving-artist type who can't afford to buy a whole lot of concert tickets, Plus I saw NIN at Madison Square Garden a couple of years ago, and that was a fantastic show. I just couldn't justify splurging on a concert for a band I'd already seen, for a concert that probably wouldn't be as good as the previous one.

I just found out that the name of that tour was Wave Goodbye, and it was the last NIN tour. I really wish that the person I can't remember from a couple of months ago had told me that. Shame on you, unmemorable person: Maybe I forgot you for a reason.

Now I could probably write an entire book just about NIN (and by the time this blog has been around for a while, I might have essentially done so), but I'm going to try to curb my verbosity enough to write a proper retrospective and cover a little bit of everything.

Nine Inch Nails: A Retrospective

NIN1.jpg

I first became aware of Nine Inch Nails at the age of twelve; this means that I have been a fan of NIN for more than half of my life. If my objectivity concerning the band is questionable, it's because we grew up together. Closer on the radio scared me like the bully down the street, Just Like You Imagined soothed my jagged teenaged nerves, and now, Discipline reminds me that no matter how far I've come in terms of maturity, or perhaps because of it, I need support so I can go further. And all of Broken was like an annoying little brother, almost as annoying as my actual little brother, which is saying something. And don't even get me started on "Reptile"; I may have first discovered the concept of sex with Paula Abdul's State of Attraction, but it wasn't until NIN that I actually gave a damn.

Among his achievements, Trent Reznor can claim several paradoxical feats- like somehow managing to simultaneously be a one-hit wonder and one of the most inimitable artists in the history of rock. Or being involved in the creation of landmark music videos that legitimized the medium as an art form, amidst the backdrop of music videos completely destroying the artistic integrity of the music industry. But perhaps the most important thing that separates NIN from other acts can be found in a simple phrase in the credits section of Pretty Hate Machine: "Nine Inch Nails is Trent Reznor."

trent-reznor-rs823.jpg

He's wasn't dead, you idiots.

Technically, NIN should be referred to as 'he', since from a legal perspective, the name only refers to one person. However, everybody- and I do mean everybody- refers to NIN as 'they', as in "They're playing at Madison Square Garden tonight." Nobody who has ever seen NIN in concert would think otherwise. Many bands fight or even break up over 'creative differences'; with NIN this would be impossible by definition, since anyone who isn't cool with Reznor having the final say doesn't join NIN in the first place. And yet, it doesn't feel like a solo act with a couple of work-for-hire flunkies- musicians like Charlie Clouser, Robert Patrick and Alessandro Cortini have played a tremendous role in NIN, along with a good dozen more artists, all of whom are charismatic, stylistically distinct, and valued by the fans. With Reznor's leadership acknowledged from the outset, NIN benefits from the presence of one cohesive creative vision instead of a bunch of compromises; they can skip most of the petty power struggles that plague more 'democratic' acts. And yet somehow, they maintain the allure, the camaraderie, the sense of adventure, of a rock band. Characteristically, what was in some respects a selfish move by Reznor- demanding total creative control- in the long run saved everyone a lot of trouble.

nin-3.jpg

There's been so many people in the line-up these past few years that I honestly have no idea who the guy on the right is-- they should start wearing name tags.

Another idiosyncrasy of NIN is the huge gap between the actual content of NIN records, and the public perception of that content. For a long time NIN was represented in pop culture as the preeminent shock-rock band; big brother-band to Marilyn Manson, awash with expletives, anathema to everything subtle, classy and refined. But as early as Broken, NIN featured piano solos among it's rock anthems, a trend that would eventually culminate in albums featuring many fully instrumental compositions, and even forays into the realm of classical. Rock critics had to pull out the big words to describe NIN records; Reznor, usually soft-spoken when interviewed, used even bigger words. Was this a crazy, drugged-out metal band, or a calculated, intellectual, progressive musical experiment?

Furthermore, why 'Nine Inch Nails'? People speculated that the title was a reference to the long nails that are used in the construction of coffins; others, perhaps optimistically, thought it referred to genitalia. The answer?

"It looks good in print", said Reznor.

Pretty Hate Machine (1989)

PHMera.jpg

I'm seriously hoping that this is actually a picture of early NIN, because for all I can tell from this one it could be New Kids On the Block.

In the mid-90's, Closer was nigh-omnipresent on the radio, but I didn't like it; It scared me. I thought explicit songs like that shouldn't be on the radio where pure, innocent little lambs like me could hear it (I think I was a snotty kid, now that I think about it.) It was hearing a random airing of Head Like a Hole that made me a fan.

PHM sounds dated; the 80's appear to the be the decade where everything now appears even more dated than dated things usually do. Dated in high-def, if you will. And Reznor's earnestness can sometimes backfire, resulting in whiny vocals that just cross the line into being slightly annoying. However, not only does the album have intermittently fantastic vocals-- The perfect annunciation of the lyrics and emotional delivery of Head Like A Hole makes the song sound more like it was written for the stage( you can clearly hear EVERY word he's saying, a breath of fresh air in the realm of rock.) While I've always found Reznor's singing to be inconsistent, when he's good he's very good, and there are plenty of examples of that here.

Even if some songs aren't performed as well as they could have been, PHM makes up for it with consistently good songwriting. Nearly every song on the LP is catchy and singable, and while the lyrics are not particularly deep, they are always memorable. Down in it is like nothing else that had come out at the time, Sin could be another stage production number (what a musical that would be), and The Only Time is so guileless and playfully raunchy that you almost have to smile. Again, for the most part PHM isn't a lyrical showstopper, but lines like "And the Devil wants to fuck me in the back of his car!" have a unique, perverse charm to them. What kind of car does the devil drive, anyway? Is going into the backseat with the devil a good thing?

Alas, 20 years later some mysteries still remain.

Broken (1992)

Nin-broken.jpg

At one point in Back To the Future, the Doc says: "You're not thinking four-dimensionally, Marty!" If you can't hear what's so great about Broken, you're not thinking four-dimensionally, Marty(and your taste in music is questionable.) Broken always sounds better in the future.

Reznor described Broken as an intentionally abrasive record, full of anger. A world of legal trouble with NIN's first label, TVT records, left him even more inclined to lament the influence of the great "They" who controlled the purse strings than usual. While at first the record sounds like a series of accidents at an industrial park (with about as much musicality), I find that it sounds better to me with every passing year. There is beauty buried deeply on the lower layers, but it isn't delivered to you on a silver platter. You have to actually acclimate yourself to listening to the record, the polar opposite of pop music's "hear it once and it's in your head" sensibility. When I first got it fifteen years ago, I liked one or two little parts of it but found the whole thing virtually unlistenable. Now, it's one of my favorite albums of all time. Listen to it long enough, and all you can hear is the beauty.

muddytrent.jpg

Woodstock '94: There are worse things than Swine Flu

NIN's performance of Happiness in Slavery in 1994 is still considered a high water mark of rock performance, at least for the kind of rock where moshing is not only permissible, but mandatory, and where everyone is far too stoned to remember what "high-water mark" means. Frustrated by the constant rain at Woodstock '94, the band took a dive in a giant mud puddle before the performance, and broke their instruments into pieces as punishment for being full of water and malfunctioning. Covered in mud, fifteen times louder than Nirvana, snarling with rage and consumed with the desire to murder some keyboards, NIN put on a show like no other. I wonder how many of the ecstatic fans in the audience knew that the song was actually mocking them, ever so slightly. My guess is zero.

The true brilliance of Broken, at least to me, is that it's not the primal scream it sounds like; there's more to it. On the umpteenth listen, you start to notice lines like these:

Slave screams, he's gonna cause the system to fall

But he's glad to be chained to that wall

Happiness in Slavery is a song about people unwillingly being pushed through the broken machine of social conformity-- or so it seems. But it's also about people who lament the machine, but are free from the responsibility to actually do anything about it by virtue of their powerlessness. People who bitch about "The System", while sitting around in their parents' basement waiting for a new CD to come out. Kind of like a lot of NIN fans. Kind of like Trent Reznor. It's unusual to have the presence of mind during your primal scream to implicate yourself.

Next Time: The Downward Spiral

0863.jpg

No, I'm not a drug addict-- I just play one on TV in order to help create a persona which I can then use as a launch pad for my philosophy and social commentary. Why do you ask?

Monday 14 September 2009

Book Review: Baudolino (by Umberto Eco)

It used to be said that the musical A Chorus Line was really meant for people who had already seen a lot of musicals; people who have never set foot in the theater before would be better off with Les Mis. I get the same feeling from Umberto Eco's novels, because while I think they're fantastic, I also think they're really meant for people who read novels all day long. If you're not a regular reader (and a novel-reader in particular), I would generally recommend something else- although, in this context, NOT Les Mis (I mean no disrespect to Hugo, but that's just not the book that's going to hook a reluctant reader into the world of literary delights.)

One of the comments I've gotten frequently about Sterling is that you really can't tell from the beginning what genre it is. In fact, two chapters into it you still really can't tell. I'm not a snob about genre fiction; I read plenty of books with elaborate, colorful pictures on the spine. However, sometimes I think announcing the genre up front is letting the cat out of the bag too early. We already know that the book we are about to read takes place in some sort of alternate reality-- it may be a reality very similar to ours, where the laws of physics remain intact, or it could be a reality where you don't know that you've jumped down the rabbit hole until you're halfway to the center of the earth. Why give that sort of thing away up front?

Eco seems to like constructing rabbit holes that have some sort of invisible force-field about halfway down; you can never confirm whether you're in a fantasy world or not. The titular Baudolino dictates a tale that's equal parts historical fact and medieval legend, and while the book has such a strange air of authenticity to it you can almost believe that centaurs did roam the middle east in the 1100s, we are assured - frequently - that Baudolino is a huge liar. If you're willing to label everything fantastical in the book as an exaggeration by Baudolino (and it makes perfect sense to do so), the book can be taken as solid historical fiction. However, passages like Baudolino's courtship of Hypathia, a fairy-like creature who should be merely whimsical, yet somehow becomes a vibrant woman that we can relate to, make us wish that the entire story were real. We don't really believe Baudolino, but I think the message of the book has something to do with how much we want to.

As historical fiction, Baudolino features plenty of sacks, murders, rapes, etc., but somehow I didn't find these sorts of details as off-putting as I did in Ken Follet's The Pillars of the Earth, a far more 'serious' historical novel. While Eco's characters feel like creatures of their times (who deal with hardships regularly and have developed an iron-tough skin), Follet's characters seemed to me to be 21st-century personalities shoehorned into historical characters awkwardly. The intent with Pillars was apparently to make you feel like you, personally, were present at the sack/murder/rape/torture, and while the book is admittedly compelling, it's compelling like a 20 car pile-up on the freeway. If anything, Baudolino is the more graphic of the two books, but it's actually the more pleasant read.

I purchased my copy at The Strand books in Manhattan; I haven't seen copies of it floating around in regular bookstores, so it may be somewhat hard to find. Whether this title is worth the time to both hunt down and read when you could be reading Foucalt's Pendulum and/or The Name of the Rose by the same author, I couldn't say; I haven't gotten around to either of those yet. I can tell you though that Eco's books are steadily moving up on my reading list.

- page 4 of 7 -